At Washington University of Science and Technology (WUST), we ensure a fair and rigorous evaluation process by selecting esteemed judges from both industry and academia. Our panel for the 2nd Washington Hackathon 2026 consists of experts with deep domain knowledge and experience in innovation, technology, and entrepreneurship.

September 19–20, 2026  |  WUST, 2900 Eisenhower Ave, Alexandria, VA 22314

Who Are Our Judges?

Industry Leaders

Professionals from top tech companies, startups, and venture capital firms.

Academic Experts

Researchers and professors specializing in AI, cybersecurity, fintech, healthcare, and more.

Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)

Specialists in emerging technologies like Web3, blockchain, and sustainable energy.

Investors & Entrepreneurs

Visionaries who understand market trends and product viability.

Selection Criteria for Judges

1

Expertise & Domain Knowledge

  • Must have significant experience in one or more of the hackathon themes.
  • Should have a strong background in technology, business, or research.
2

Industry & Academic Recognition

  • Senior professionals from reputed organizations, startups, or think tanks.
  • Professors or researchers with published work and contributions to their field.
3

Experience in Innovation & Entrepreneurship

  • Must have worked on groundbreaking projects, patents, or startups.
  • Experience in evaluating startups, research grants, or hackathons is preferred.
4

Fairness & Impartiality

  • Must demonstrate integrity and the ability to provide unbiased evaluations.
  • Should not have direct affiliations with participating teams.
5

Commitment to the Judging Process

  • Ability to review projects, provide constructive feedback, and engage with participants.
  • Availability on September 19–20, 2026 for presentations and discussions, and to review the ideas submitted by the September 17, 2026 deadline.

How We Appoint Judges

1

Invitation & Nomination

We invite experienced professionals and accept nominations based on merit.

2

Expert Panel Review

A selection committee evaluates candidates to ensure a balanced and diverse panel.

3

Conflict of Interest Check

Judges must disclose any affiliations with participating teams.

4

Final Confirmation

Appointed judges receive detailed guidelines and participate in an orientation session.